![]() |
Active Topics Memberlist Calendar Search |
| Die Bibliothek ( |
|
| |
|
| Author | Message |
|
HvM
SS-Sturmbannführer
Joined: 12 January 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2640 |
![]() Topic: Review - Black EdelweissPosted: 16 December 2006 at 09:00 |
|
Black Edelweiss
Edited by HvM - 23 May 2007 at 13:29 |
|
|
Tumbleweed alert! - Papa Wehr -
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
Jack O'Brien
SS-Sturmmann
Joined: 01 September 2009 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 59 |
![]() Posted: 14 October 2009 at 05:38 |
|
Just saw this post after creating my own topic about this book... my bad. I thought this book was excellent. I believe his motivation for writing it was because there was outcry about a German politician visiting a cemetary where Waffen SS soldiers were buried.
He's the only person I've ever heard complain about the MG42 and say the 34 was more useful. If I remember correctly he says the MG42 fired too quickly and so he exhausted his ammunition at an alarming rate whereas the MG34's rate of fire was more controllable.
Anyway, excellent book
|
|
|
"In the absence of orders, find something and kill it" Erwin Rommel
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
Tiger_S04
SS-Oberstgruppenführer
’Der Panzerkommandant’ Joined: 28 September 2004 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1257 |
![]() Posted: 14 October 2009 at 15:16 |
|
Originally posted by Jack O'Brien Just saw this post after creating my own topic about this book... my bad. I thought this book was excellent. I believe his motivation for writing it was because there was outcry about a German politician visiting a cemetary where Waffen SS soldiers were buried/ Might it have been the Bitburg incident (mentioned in my dissertation on the main site) where then US President Ronald Reagan visited the Bitburg cemetary (where 49 young Waffen-SS men were buried) with then Chancellor Helmut Kohl? He's the only person I've ever heard complain about the MG42 and say the 34 was more useful. If I remember correctly he says the MG42 fired too quickly and so he exhausted his ammunition at an alarming rate whereas the MG34's rate of fire was more controllable. I have read elsewhere that some veterans thought the 42 got way too hot when used for long bursts of fire - and that the 34 was also more efficient and easier to strip and clean. Sounds like a very interesting book, cheers for the info guys. ![]() |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
||
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|